I bought a replacement drive chain from David Silver Spares for my CB750F1.
Tagasako RK530H 102 links, with a split link.
Well I actually took notice of the advice on the box (very rare for me), and looked up the specifications on the RK website.
Suitable for bikes upto 40 Bhp apparently.
Should I be worried ?
Apparently the good old F1 puts out about 55 to 60 Bhp at the rear wheel, maybe 50% more than recommended.
Are standard type roller chains weaker than they used to make 'em ?
Or have the chain makers downgraded the chain rating in order to push owners towards more modern, gold plated, X ring chains that they make big profits on ?
I remember that back in the day, nearly everything ran on 530 chain, with the exception of the big Kawasaki maybe.
Never had a chain snap on my GT750 or my old F1, and they were well thrashed.
I did lubricate my chains with EP140 gear oil.
It went everywhere and stunk of sulphur, but I noticed my chain outlasted those lubed with aerosol chain lube.
Tagasako RK530H 102 links, with a split link.
Well I actually took notice of the advice on the box (very rare for me), and looked up the specifications on the RK website.
Suitable for bikes upto 40 Bhp apparently.
Should I be worried ?
Apparently the good old F1 puts out about 55 to 60 Bhp at the rear wheel, maybe 50% more than recommended.
Are standard type roller chains weaker than they used to make 'em ?
Or have the chain makers downgraded the chain rating in order to push owners towards more modern, gold plated, X ring chains that they make big profits on ?
I remember that back in the day, nearly everything ran on 530 chain, with the exception of the big Kawasaki maybe.
Never had a chain snap on my GT750 or my old F1, and they were well thrashed.
I did lubricate my chains with EP140 gear oil.
It went everywhere and stunk of sulphur, but I noticed my chain outlasted those lubed with aerosol chain lube.